Module: MSc IoT Project

Module Specifications.

Current Academic Year 2024 - 2025

All Module information is indicative, and this portal is an interim interface pending the full upgrade of Coursebuilder and subsequent integration to the new DCU Student Information System (DCU Key).

As such, this is a point in time view of data which will be refreshed periodically. Some fields/data may not yet be available pending the completion of the full Coursebuilder upgrade and integration project. We will post status updates as they become available. Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Date posted: September 2024

Module Title	MSc IoT Project
Module Code	EE5003 (ITS) / EEN1061 (Banner)
Faculty	Engineering & Computing	School	Electronic Engineering
Module Co-ordinator	Mingming Liu
Module Teachers	Conor Mcardle, Derek Molloy, Jennifer Bruton
NFQ level	9	Credit Rating	15
Pre-requisite	Not Available
Co-requisite	Not Available
Compatibles	Not Available
Incompatibles	Not Available

Repeat the module
Array

Description

To allow the student to put theoretical knowledge of engineering to use in a practical project related to the Internet of Things (IoT) and to document the project outputs to research publication standard. In this module students will use and develop knowledge and skills in planning and managing projects, risk and health & safety assessments, reviewing literature, analysing, defining and implementing an engineering solution, documenting and presenting outcomes and key findings.

Learning Outcomes

1. Design and implement a test-bed or prototype of a novel solution to an electronic and/or computer technology challenge, allowing for identified technical requirements, health and safety, ethical issues and practicality.
2. Devise appropriate tests or experiments in order to allow exploration, analysis and evaluation of a proposed solution.
3. Use statistical approaches, critical analysis, quantitative and/or qualitative comparisons to evaluate the quality of their own work and that of others and to draw concrete conclusions as to the effectiveness of their design.
4. Document their work in a well structured portfolio (consisting of conference paper, video presentation/demonstration, reflective journal etc.), where the contents communicate technical concepts, ideas and outcomes at the correct level of technical detail to suit the intended reader, and where the student's own work is distinguished with that of others in a proper manner. Students will peer review other students’ work in order to aid reflection.
5. Apply and adapt appropriate project planning and reflective journal approaches in the execution of the project in order to undertake all project implementation and development work, and to produce a complete RD&I project to a deadline, whilst taking responsibility for managing their interactions with other project stakeholders.

*Type*	*Hours*	*Description*
Workload	Full-time hours per semester
Directed learning	15	Initial project implementation and technical set up
Independent Study	300	Technical Implementation
Portfolio Preparation	60	Final Portfolio Production & Assessment
Total Workload: 375

All module information is indicative and subject to change. For further information,students are advised to refer to the University's Marks and Standards and Programme Specific Regulations at: http://www.dcu.ie/registry/examinations/index.shtml

Indicative Content and Learning Activities

Implementation of Solution
Activities carried out to fulfill the project plan. May take many forms - laboratory work, computer based analysis, cognitive reasoning etc.

Testing & Analysis of Results
Designing appropriate tests and evaluating the outcome from these and the new information developed during the project in a critical and insightful manner.

Documentation of Outcomes
Production of a digtial portfolio which should document key aspects and findings of the project and reach conclusions. The portfolio should also include a video demonstration of the project outcomes.

Communication
Arranged communications with industry stakeholders, technical support and module coordinator to discuss the advancement of the project and the technical resources/inputs required.

Assessment Breakdown
Continuous Assessment	100%	Examination Weight	0%

Type	Description	% of total	Assessment Date
Course Work Breakdown
Presentation	Elevator Pitch Video. This three minute video pitch will be created early in the module by each student. The presentation should describe the value of the proposed project work to a non-technical audience. The assessment of this element is performed by peer review.	10%	n/a
Performance evaluation	Elevator Pitch Video Peer Review. Students receive marks based on the quality of the constructive feedback they provide on the elevator pitches to their peers. This element will be graded by the module coordinator of this module in order to provide consistent feedback to all students.	5%	n/a
Reflective journal	Project Planning, Reflective Journal/Blog and Repositories. Students will maintain a blog of all work performed throughout the project that aligns with the project plan that is developed in the preceding EE5RDI module. All source code (where present) and development materials (e.g., pcb designs, script files, system designs) will be maintained in a git repository with regular commit histories and versioning. This element will be graded by the module coordinator.	15%	Other
Project	Conference Paper and Video Demonstration. Assessment will take the form of a research conference submission, where students submit their work in the form of a conference paper, video demonstration, and supporting code/blog capture to a conference-like submission system. The module coordinator will act as the conference chair and will coordinate the assignment of reviews to academic staff. Ideally, each submission (paper and demonstration video) will be graded by three academics (including postdoctoral support) and graded using a rubric.	70%	Other

Reassessment Requirement Type
Resit arrangements are explained by the following categories: Resit category 1: A resit is available for both* components of the module. Resit category 2: No resit is available for a 100% continuous assessment module. Resit category 3: No resit is available for the continuous assessment component where there is a continuous assessment and examination element.
* ‘Both’ is used in the context of the module having a Continuous Assessment/Examination split; where the module is 100% continuous assessment, there will also be a resit of the assessment
This module is category 2

Indicative Reading List

Hannah Spring, Barbara Sen and Maria J. Grant: 2013, Research, evaluation and audit: key steps in demonstrating your value, [eBook], Facet, London, UK, 9781856049719
Paul D. Leehy and Jeanne Ellis Ormrod: 2015, Practical Research: Planning and Design, Global Edition, 11th [eBook], Pearson, Edinburgh, UK, B019CQ9F0I
Ann Pilkington: 2013, Communicating projects: an end-to-end guide to planning, implementing and evaluating effective communication, [eBook], Gower, Farnham, Surrey, UK, 9781409453208

Other Resources

None