DCU Home | Our Courses | Loop | Registry | Library | Search DCU
<< Back to Module List

Module Specifications.

Current Academic Year 2024 - 2025

All Module information is indicative, and this portal is an interim interface pending the full upgrade of Coursebuilder and subsequent integration to the new DCU Student Information System (DCU Key).

As such, this is a point in time view of data which will be refreshed periodically. Some fields/data may not yet be available pending the completion of the full Coursebuilder upgrade and integration project. We will post status updates as they become available. Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Date posted: September 2024

Module Title Public Policy Evaluation
Module Code LG5040 (ITS) / POL1062 (Banner)
Faculty Humanities & Social Sciences School Law & Government
Module Co-ordinatorDeiric Ó Broin
Module TeachersEoin O'Malley
NFQ level 9 Credit Rating 10
Pre-requisite Not Available
Co-requisite Not Available
Compatibles Not Available
Incompatibles Not Available
Coursework Only
Description

The need for more evidence-informed decisions in government is a regular theme of public service reform programmes, and recent initiatives have emphasised the need to enhance evaluation capacity within government and public service organisations. In public policy-making and public programmes, evaluation has been defined as the “assessment of merit, worth and value of administration, output, and outcome of government interventions, which is intended to play a role in future practical action situations” (Vedung). This module provides an overview of the link between evaluation exercises and wider policy-making processes, evaluation and implementation, the emphases of different evaluation exercises and approaches, and related approaches such as process evaluation and performance measurement systems. The course also explores ways evaluation findings might contribute more to policy-making. The module complements other modules in the MSc in Public Policy programme by giving students a firm understanding of the principles of evaluation and different evaluation approaches and purposes. By exploring these themes, students gain a deeper critical understanding of different approaches to policy evaluation and the role evaluation can play in the policy-making process.

Learning Outcomes

1. Understand the place of evaluation within policy-making and different approaches to policy-making.
2. Understand and recognise the different uses, purposes and emphasis of evaluation exercises.
3. Appreciate some insights from established process evaluation techniques and the strengths and limitations of different evaluation approaches.
4. Appreciate how evaluation findings and research can be integrated into the policy process.



Workload Full-time hours per semester
Type Hours Description
Lecture11No Description
Debate11Discussion of core readings in class.
Assignment Completion225No Description
Assessment Feedback3No Description
Total Workload: 250

All module information is indicative and subject to change. For further information,students are advised to refer to the University's Marks and Standards and Programme Specific Regulations at: http://www.dcu.ie/registry/examinations/index.shtml

Indicative Content and Learning Activities

Policy-Making and Evaluation

Evaluation and Implementation

Policy Evaluation Uses, Purposes and Audiences

Process Evaluation and Developing a Programme Logic Model

Performance Measurement

Making the Most of Evaluation

Assessment Breakdown
Continuous Assessment100% Examination Weight0%
Course Work Breakdown
TypeDescription% of totalAssessment Date
EssayEssay 5000-word essay: Students should choose one of the assignment options below. 1) Drawing on varied examples, discuss how evaluation is likely to be used in different ways in different circumstances. What implications do these differences have for evaluators? 2) Drawing on examples from different fields, explain some of the difficulties that can arise with performance measurement and the use of indicators to assess performance in meeting policy objectives. What implications do you think these difficulties have for evaluators, and how might some of these difficulties be overcome?100%n/a
Reassessment Requirement Type
Resit arrangements are explained by the following categories:
Resit category 1: A resit is available for both* components of the module.
Resit category 2: No resit is available for a 100% continuous assessment module.
Resit category 3: No resit is available for the continuous assessment component where there is a continuous assessment and examination element.
* ‘Both’ is used in the context of the module having a Continuous Assessment/Examination split; where the module is 100% continuous assessment, there will also be a resit of the assessment
This module is category 1
Indicative Reading List

  • Scott R. Furlong and Michael E. Kraft: 2020, Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives,
  • John Hogan, Mary P. Murphy: 2021, Policy Analysis in Ireland,
  • Johnston Miller, K. and D. McTavish: 0, Making and Managing Public Policy,
Other Resources

None

<< Back to Module List