DCU Home | Our Courses | Loop | Registry | Library | Search DCU
<< Back to Module List

Latest Module Specifications

Current Academic Year 2025 - 2026

Module Title Creative Construction
Module Code EDP1089 (ITS: SG306)
Faculty STEM Ed, Innov, Global Studies School DCU Institute of Education
NFQ level 8 Credit Rating 5
Description

In today’s rapidly changing complex world, rapid advancements in technology and increased global competition mean that the ability to think and act creatively is more important than ever before. Therefore, the need for teachers to have the knowledge, skills and abilities to use digital technologies as part of teaching, learning and assessment was never more important. Teachers are pivotal to ensuring children develop Computational Thinking (CT), so it is essential they are effectively prepared, starting at preservice level, to incorporate CT into pedagogical practices. Grounded in constructionist principles and adopting the stance that CT be developed as part of subject areas other than computer science, this module aims to enable students to combine engineering design thinking and critical thinking with computing power as the foundation for innovating solutions to real-life problems. In this module we will explore digital technologies, activities, practices and strategies to enable students to design learning environments to engage children in creative learning experiences, so that they can develop as creative thinkers and flexible problem-solvers in order to flourish in a fast-changing world. Through hands-on activities and discussions, this module will use a range of computational materials and contexts to explore strategies for supporting interest-driven, project-based, collaborative approaches to learning through the lens of design thinking, the engineering design thinking process and constructivist/ constructionist learning theory.

Learning Outcomes

1. Become familiar with and proficient in the use of a range of contemporary programmable robotics technologies and develop an understanding of their potential for student learning and meaning making ( e.g. SPIKE Essentials, SPIKE Prime ).
2. Work with a team to design and develop a cross curricular thematic learning activity centred on a real world issue which focuses on developing children’s problem-solving strategies using programmable robotics technologies (i.e. SPIKE Essentials, SPIKE Prime ).
3. Justify the design of the learning activity in relation to research literature relating to robotics and key concepts related to the engineering design thinking process and constructivist/ constructionist learning theory.
4. Acquire insights from the thematic projects of other students and reflect on them in relation to their own learning, curriculum integration and classroom practice.
5. Begin to understand the dynamic relationship between research, theory, and practice in the design and development of a technology-rich learning activity focusing on a real world issue.


WorkloadFull time hours per semester
TypeHoursDescription
Seminars24Computer lab based - workshop / Lecture format
Total Workload: 24
Section Breakdown
CRN20291Part of TermSemester 2
Coursework0%Examination Weight0%
Grade Scale40PASSPass Both ElementsY
Resit CategoryRC1Best MarkN
Module Co-ordinatorAnne McMorroughModule TeacherCiaran Maher, Deirdre Butler
Assessment Breakdown
TypeDescription% of totalAssessment Date
AssignmentEssay - 40% Blog - 60% which is broken down as follows: The Blog should reflect the learning experiences engaged with as part of this course during this semester. Please include photos, video and narrative to illustrate and reflect on these learning experiences. Please refer to literature/readings and coursework you have engaged with to date including other modules across the programme to date. Essay (1250 words) - Designing a Constructionist Learning Environment In this essay you will need to discuss: • What is Constuctionism? • What are the key principles to think about when designing a constructionist learning environment? • Use examples / coursework to back up & support po100%n/a
Reassessment Requirement Type
Resit arrangements are explained by the following categories;
RC1: A resit is available for both* components of the module.
RC2: No resit is available for a 100% coursework module.
RC3: No resit is available for the coursework component where there is a coursework and summative examination element.

* ‘Both’ is used in the context of the module having a coursework/summative examination split; where the module is 100% coursework, there will also be a resit of the assessment

Pre-requisite None
Co-requisite None
Compatibles None
Incompatibles None

All module information is indicative and subject to change. For further information,students are advised to refer to the University's Marks and Standards and Programme Specific Regulations at: http://www.dcu.ie/registry/examinations/index.shtml

Indicative Content and Learning Activities

Indicative Content
• The theoretical approach used for designing the learning experiences of this module incorporates elements from Papert’s (1980) constructionist framework, which states that people can learn deeply when they build their own meaningful projects in a community of learners and reflect carefully on the process. Papert introduced the ‘idea of the computer being the children's machine that would allow them to develop procedural thinking through programming’ (Dede et al., 2013, p. 2), enabling them to combine critical thinking with computing power as the foundation for innovating solutions to real-life problems (Tabesh, 2017). For Papert, CT is therefore more than just a problem-solving process as it requires learners to solve problems algorithmically and develop a level of technological fluency and language as they learn to communicate and express their ideas with the language of code (Papert, 1980). • The module builds on the earlier “Design and Build to Learn” module which provides a critical introduction to constructionism / computational thinking and its potential use for learning as students develop a range of digital artefacts. • To extend students computational thinking they will engage in designing and constructing their own projects using SPIKE Essentials, SPIKE Prime in particular. These programming environments enable students to build personally meaningful artefacts which then become “objects to think with”. • The workshop sessions will be a blended approach of skill development with discussion and reflection on the effective use of these digital tools in the curriculum and the implications for designing learning environments. This format will enable the students to become comfortable with the iterative nature of learning and creating through failure. • Students will work with a team to design, facilitate and rework a cross curricular thematic learning activity which focuses on developing children’s problem-solving strategies using computational materials (i.e. SPIKE Essentials, SPIKE Prime) • By engaging with pertinent research literature on this cross curricular thematic learning approach, students will have the opportunity to develop their understandings of how computational thinking can be embedded in classroom practice supporting interest-driven, project-based, collaborative approaches to learning through the lens of design thinking, the engineering design thinking process and constructivist/ constructionist learning theory.

Indicative Reading List

Books:
  • Seymour, P: 1980, Mindstorms, 1, MIT Press, https://mindstorms.media.mit.edu/,
  • Papert, S.: 1991, Situating constructionism In: Papert S, Harel I (eds) Constructionism. Research reports and essays, 1985–1990 by the Epistemology & Learning Research Group.,


Articles:
  • Butler, D.: 2007, A Constructionist view of what it means to be digitally literate, The Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2 (61-77), 517747
  • 2006: Computational Thinking, Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM,, 49(3), 33-35., 517748, 1
  • Computational Thinking: 10 years on: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/computational-thinking-10-years-later/, 517749, 1, Papert, S.
  • In Proceedings from Japanese Educators Conference.: http://www. papert. org/articles/const_inst., 517750, 1, Ackermann, E., 2001
  • 5(3): 438,
Other Resources

None

<< Back to Module List View 2024/25 Module Record for SG306